Flipping The Switch On Equity And Justice In Conservation And Development

Participation, community engagement, equitable development, sustainability – all terms familiar to conservation and development practitioners, public philanthropic contributors, and the donor community. Since virtually all espouse to these “pillars”, clearly they must be being adhered to, evidence must abound, and progress toward participatory, equitable, and sustainable development that engages communities as pivotal stakeholders in conservation and development processes must be the norm.

But is it?

A network of researchers and practitioners have been examining the evidence around participation and community engagement with indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) for several years. In fact we have learned that evidence is weak that organizations working in conservation and development can clearly explain how communities are engaged, whether they ever play a lead role in driving conservation and development, if they do not how this impacts project or program outcomes, and why this nebulous state of affairs would be the case after billions of dollars have been spent globally on conservation and development efforts  over the past 20-30 years. This is at a time when the metrics for forest loss and biodiversity declines continue to raise tremendous alarm. And still, the strategies and approaches that most organizations take appear to perpetuate outcomes that do not reverse the course.

Historically, strategies for projects in economic development or biodiversity conservation are driven by economists in the case of the former, conservation scientists in the case of the latter. Donors support these “expert” driven initiatives because, naturally, experts know best. Yet, do they always?

Community, be they indigenous or simply “local” – meaning they are comprised of heterogenous peoples who may or may not have indigenous or strong ethnic backgrounds in dynamic contexts where social change has occurred over hundreds of years – often understand the contexts they live in best. They understand their priorities. They understand most of the constraints to their development or conservation of their resources. What they may lack are options for realizing how to balance their priorities in a way that their development aspirations and conservation of their resources remain compatible.

At the heart of achieving this balance, their must be equity and justice. Too many contexts in remote forested countries, governance and judicial systems are weak. Corruption on a grand scale, or “simple” administrative corruption abound and constrain people daily.

Justice for indigenous peoples and local communities must be taken seriously regardless of its impact on nature. Evidence increasingly shows that when the rights of IPLCs are recognized through secure land tenure and national constitutions, nature thrives as well. While most who work on conservation and development issues know this, few are prioritizing this as a core objective. So too, community and local NGO capacity building to enable self-reliance after decades of acknowledgment as a priority, remains a tremendous need.

To achieve sustainability for nature and people, justice, equity, and strengthened local capacities need to become priorities in development and conservation programming.  This describes Nature For Justice’s mission.

Author

  • Michael Brown

    Michael has over 35 years of global experience specializing on community engagement in the design, implementation, and evaluation of natural resource management and biodiversity conservation projects.

    View all posts

More to explore

First 30×30: Indigenous Nations Lead the Way

In the United States, small-scale farmers account for 90% of all farms but manage less than 50% of total farmland. This imbalance is becoming more acute as small farmers face mounting challenges: the average age of these farmers exceeds 60, the costs of agricultural inputs continue to rise, and large-scale farms benefit from economies of scale. Compounding these difficulties, small farms are disproportionately affected by extreme weather events, droughts, and changing growing seasons—factors that disrupt crop yields and livestock production. These pressures are driving younger generations away from farming, threatening the backbone of the nation’s agricultural network.

For companies seeking to build resilient, ethical, and climate-smart supply chains, this program offers a scalable and strategic solution. Through partnering with farmers through the program, businesses can ensure a reliable supply of high-quality agricultural products while supporting the long-term viability of smallholder farms.

Read More »
North Carolina Agricultural Fields with a Farmer House

Growing American Farmer Prosperity Program: How we’re Reinventing Supply Chain Resilience through Regenerative Smallholder Farming

In the United States, small-scale farmers account for 90% of all farms but manage less than 50% of total farmland. This imbalance is becoming more acute as small farmers face mounting challenges: the average age of these farmers exceeds 60, the costs of agricultural inputs continue to rise, and large-scale farms benefit from economies of scale. Compounding these difficulties, small farms are disproportionately affected by extreme weather events, droughts, and changing growing seasons—factors that disrupt crop yields and livestock production. These pressures are driving younger generations away from farming, threatening the backbone of the nation’s agricultural network.

For companies seeking to build resilient, ethical, and climate-smart supply chains, this program offers a scalable and strategic solution. Through partnering with farmers through the program, businesses can ensure a reliable supply of high-quality agricultural products while supporting the long-term viability of smallholder farms.

Read More »

Scaling Regenerative Agriculture For BIPOC Farmers

Nature For Justice’s Farmer Inclusion team is passionately committed to advancing regenerative agriculture, a transformative approach that not only fosters healthier soils but also minimizes input costs and enhances the resilience of farming systems against extreme and erratic weather conditions, as well as the broader impacts of climate change. Our strategy is grounded in a comprehensive multi-step approach that emphasizes co-creation and shared risk among farmers. We anticipate that scaling our initiatives will rely heavily on private sector investors recognizing the immense value of our bridge financing model, which effectively reduces both financial and ecological risks while ensuring competitive returns. This model ultimately aims to lessen our dependence on continual philanthropic support.

To date, in North Carolina, we have successfully engaged over 125 farmers who manage more than 7,000 acres dedicated to regenerative agriculture. This milestone has been achieved through the disbursement of over $1 million to these farmers, with an additional $2.5 million forecasted for distribution by 2025. We are also preparing to expand our initiatives into Virginia, with ambitious plans to extend our positive impact throughout the Southeast and Midwest.

Read More »

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *